Chairman: Bruce E. Pelz
Parliamentarian: Ben Yalow
Secretary: Elayne F. Pelz
[Scanned and converted by Pat McMurray and Tim Illingworth in December 1999]
The meeting was called to order at 10:15 am. An announcement regarding the hours of site selection was made - Site Selection would be between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m, on both Friday and Saturday.
A sign-up sheet was passed around. See attached. Copies of the agenda were handed out.
The first order of business was a Motion of Censure against the 1987 World Science Fiction Convention -Conspiracy. An Objection to consideration failed and the final wording was:
"Whereas Conspiracy 1987 did not conduct the site selection for the 1990 Worldcon in a manner consistent with the Constitution in that the mail ballot option was not universally available to voters outside of Britain, resolved that they be censured." Signed: Robert E. Sacks, Lance C. Oszko, Andre Lieven, Glen P. Boettcher, Mike Resnick, Mike Glyer.
This was passed and there was discussion on how to get future conventions to handle problems like these properly. Robert Sacks was appointed a committee to cure future mail ballot problems and to report back to the Main Business meeting on Saturday.
The second order of business was Financial Reports of Worldcon Committees. As per the constitution, past and future Worldcons are to give financial reports to the current Business Meeting. Noreascon III (1989) and Confiction (1990) turned in reports. Conspiracy (1987) sent a letter, stating that a preliminary report would be turned in by the end of the weekend. See attached.
The third order of business was to set debate limits on business carried forward from the 1987 Business Meeting. This business was published in the Nolacon II Program Book, pp. 158-160. (Text to be included in Main Business Meeting minutes).
A WSFS Constitutional amendment regarding the terms of office for members of the Mark Registration and Protection Committee was put forth and was given a 1 minute time limit for debate (wording in Main Business Meeting minutes). Section 5 of the report was given, which proposed a new standing rule on how the nominations and elections of the Mark Registration and Protection Committee were to be handled. Much discussion, and confusion ensued, which was stopped when the Chairman moved to postpone the wording of the amendment and the actual vote until the Main Business Meeting, when he would propose clearer wording.
The next order of Business was the report of the Special Committee to Codify Business Meeting Resolutions. Donald Eastlake presented the report (see attached). A motion to remove one of the resolutions was postponed until the Main Business Meeting. The Committee will continue next year.
The next order of business was the nominations for Election to the Mark Registration & Protection Committee. The following persons were nominated and accepted the nomination: Ben Yalow (East), Jim Gilpatrick (East), Scott Dennis (Central), Donald Eastlake (East), Rick Katze (East) and Kees van Toorn (non-North America).
After discussion, the WSFS Membership motion was given a 1 minute time limit for debate (wording in the Main Business Meeting minutes).
After discussion, the separation of the NASFiC from the WSFS Constitution was given a six minute time limit for debate (wording in the Main Business Meeting minutes).
After a Special Order of Business was declared, many motions were put forth to change the site-selection rotation plan. A 12 year rotation plan was amended by substitution down to a "no double skipping of Regions" amendment. A four-zone rotation plan was presented as an amendment by substitution after a second similar motion was withdrawn from consideration in favor of the first (all are attached). After much discussion, the four-zone plan was rejected and the "Double Skipping of Regions" proposal was accepted. It was given a 6 minute time limit for debate.
The meeting recessed at 11:56 a.m. until the next day.
The meeting was called to order at 10:10 arm..
Financial reports were submitted by Nolacon II, Conspiracy and Confederation.
The following are the motions passed on from Conspiracy to Nolacon II which needed to be ratified and what happened to each.
PASSED
PASSED
An amendment to remove the original "three future worldcons" was accepted and the above was passed.
PASSED
PASSED
A motion to split this motion failed.
PASSED
Amendments to this failed and it was passed as written with the proviso that it shall affect only Worldcons after 1991.
Ballots were collected for the Election of the Mark Registration and Protection Committee members and C. Chapman, T. Harvia and B. Pelz were appointed to count the ballots after the Business Meeting.
PASSED
There shall be a NASFiC Separation and Drafting Committee which shall propose a set of governing documents for the NASFiC, together with any other necessary plans to implement the separation of the NASFiC from the WSFS. The Committee shall consist of one (1) member appointed to serve at the pleasure of each future selected NASFiC or Worldcon Committee in North America and each of the Worldcon Committees in North America for the preceding three (3) years, and between three (3) and six (6) members selected from time to time by the Business Meeting of Worldcons in North America. Of the three to six selected members, at least one and at most two may be residing, at the time of selection, in any single North American region, as defined in Article III, Section 5, and at least one shall be a citizen or resident of Canada. If vacancies occur in selected memberships in the committee, the Committee may temporarily fill the vacancies. The Committee shall determine and elect its own officers.
FAILED
This generated much debate, but was defeated 57 to 29.
PASSED
PASSED
PASSED
The next order of business was the Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Solving the Problem, which presented this resolution:
PASSED
The committees of the 1989 and 1990 Worldcons were asked to answer any questions by the audience. Mark Olson, Boston, and Kees van Toorn, Holland, made statements and answered questions on their conventions.
A motion was presented to suspend Standing Rule 19 and allow bidders for 1992 make their presentations at this time. Washington, D.C. and Orlando, Fl. both made presentations.
The meeting was recessed at 12:15 p.m. until Sunday, at 10:00 am, when the site selection announcement would be made for the 1991 Worldcon.
Elayne Pelz
September 20, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 10:03 a.m.
The chairman announced the new members of the Mark Registration and Protection Committee:
Kees van Toorn - Holland
Scott Dennis - Central USA
Don Eastlake III - Eastern USA
The chairman announced that Chicago will hold the 1991 Worldcon. The balloting was as follows:
| Voted For: | on site | by mail | total |
| Chicago | 882 | 335 | 1217 |
| Sydney | 123 | 75 | 198 |
| None of the Above | 4 | 4 | |
| No Preference | 15 | 7 | 22 |
| Invalid | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| San Diego | 1 | 1 | |
| Galapagos | 1 | 1 | |
| Highmore | 1 | 1 | |
| Bogota | 1 | 1 | |
| Willmont Mountain | 1 | 1 | |
| Hold Over Funds | 1 | 1 | |
| Canada | 1 | 1 | |
| Poughkeepsie | 1 | 1 | |
| Tasmania | 1 | 1 | |
| Rottnest Island | 2 | 2 | |
| Total: | 1034 | 422 | 1456 |
Chicago announced their guests to be:
GoH: Hal Clement
Art: Richard Powers
Editor: Martin Harvey Greenberg
Fans: Jon and Joanie Stopa
The meeting was adjourned at 10:13 a.m.
Elayne Pelz
September 21, 1988
The Committee wishes to express its appreciation to Nolacon II for a contribution of $ 1,800, to ConFiction for a contribution of $ 1,375, and to ConFederation for an additional contribution of $ 1,000. The contributions of Nolacon and ConFiction continue the tradition of contributing $1 per vote in the site selection by which that Worldcon was chosen. The total ConFederation contributions have been what they consider to be an appropriate amount, which has been significantly above this guideline. ConFiction's contribution is under protest due to Conspiracy's problems in getting the site selection voting fees to them.
During the past year, the application for registration of WORLDCON in the United Kingdom has been refiled due to an error in the original filing and WORLD SCIENCE FICTION CONVENTION has been registered in the Benelux countries. The registration of our marks in the United Kingdom is still in process. If registration is achieved in the United Kingdom, changes in law to be effective in 1992 may give protection throughout the European Economic Community.
In addition, the committee has contacted "World SF, The International Association of Science Fiction Professionals" and has requested that they include a disclaimer in their publications, to the effect that they are not associated with the World Science Fiction Society or the World Science Fiction Convention.
To reciprocate the above mentioned request to World SF, the committee requests the following resolution be adopted by the Business Meeting:
To clarify when new members take their seats on the committee, a matter about which some controversy arose last year, the committee recommends the adoption of the following amendment to the WSFS Constitution:
The current Standing Rules for the Governance of the WSFS Business Meeting give procedures for handling nominations and election to the Mark Registration and Protection Committee that are incorrect because they ignore the zonal restrictions on elected membership now in the Constitution. The committee suggests that the following be adopted to rectify this situation. It is complicated, but that is because the zonal restrictions in the Constitution are complicated to enforce, particularly when you take into account situations that will occur when there are nominees from outside North America, extra vacancies on the Committee due to resignation, death, etc. Since the required procedures are inherently complicated, in the general case, it seems best to have each Business Meeting figure out something that will work and write it down once rather than staff have to figure it out each year.
The financial report of the committee will be submitted as a supplement to this report
A list of the committee membership for the past year is attached
Donald E. Eastlake, III
Chairman, Mark Registration and Protection Committee
Bank Account balance at the end of ConSpiracy 640.6 8
Contributions received:
from ConFederation 1000.00
from Nolacon II 1683.00
Payments made:
to Marks and Clerk re British trademark filing 1432.42
To Jim Gilpatrick expenses reimbursement 10.92
Bank Account Balance at the beginning of Nolacon: 2071.26
Contribution received, not yet deposited:
ConFiction 1375.00
Available Funds, 3 September 1988 3446.26
Scott C. Dennis
(1) substitute the following for Article I, Section 4:
The Membership of WSFS shall consist of all persons for whom timely payment of membership dues has been made to any Worldcon. Only natural persons who hold attending membership in the current Worldcon have the right to attend or vote at the Business Meeting held at said Worldcon.
(2) substitute "member of the administering Worldcon" and "members of the administering Worldcon" for "WSFS member" and "WSFS members" in Articles II and III.
Moved by Donald E. Eastlake, III
Seconded by Rick Katze
The current provision in the WSFS Constitution provides that the membership shall only be those who have paid dues for the current Worldcon. This does not make much sense with the three year lead time in site selection projecting into the future and with past Worldcons required to make financial reports up to two years after their con. Since WSFS is an unincorporated association, WSFS only exists as its members and a broad membership in WSFS avoids a number of procedural difficulties. Rather than trying to pick an exact time bracket, it seems simpler and shorter to just make everyone who ever paid dues to any Worldcon a member of WSFS.
This amendment has no net effect on who can nominate or vote for the Hugo Award or who can vote on site selection.
It also makes it crystal clear who can attend the Business Meeting. The many persons who would be added to WSFS "membership" by the first part of this amendment are specifically denied the right to attend or vote at the Business Meeting unless they are also an attending member of the Worldcon at which the Business Meeting is held.
Whereas the presence of the North American Science Fiction Convention or NASFiC in the WSFS Constitution is a source of controversy, and
Whereas no other local, regional, national, or continental convention is regulated in the WSFS Constitution,
Therefore, be it resolved
TO AMEND THE WSFS CONSTITUTION by adding two sections to Article IV:
"Upon the adoption and ratification of a separate set of governing documents for the NASFiC, all references to the North American Science Fiction Convention or NASFiC shall be removed from the WSFS Constitution, and the NASFiC mark shall be transferred to the new organization. The governing documents shall be adopted by any Business Meeting for a NASFiC or a Worldcon in North America, and ratified by a Business Meeting for the next NASFiC or the next Worldcon in North America."
There shall be a NASFiC Separation and Drafting Committee which shall propose a set of governing documents for the NASFiC, together with any other necessary plans to implement the separation of the NASFiC from the WSFS. The Committee shall consist of one (1) member appointed to serve at the pleasure of each future selected NASFiC or Worldcon Committee in North America and each of the Worldcon Committees in North America for the preceding three (3) years, and between three (3) and six (6) members selected from time to time by the Business Meeting of Worldcons in North America. Of the three to six selected members, at least one and at most two may be residing, at the time of selection, in any single North American region, as defined in Article III, Section 5, and at least one shall be a citizen or resident of Canada. If vacancies occur in selected memberships in the committee, the Committee may temporarily fill the vacancies. The Committee shall determine and elect its own officers.
Robert E Sacks
Bruce ??
This amendment will not serve to invalidate any existing bid.
Robert E Sacks
??
Moved by Gavin Claypool
Seconded by R Laurraine Tutihasi
To promote the accessibility of the Worldcon to all fans, and to encourage bids by reducing the element of chance, sites are divided into four (4) regions, as follows (islands, ocean areas and Antarctic sites are in the same region as the continental sites with. which they are most naturally associated):
(1) Pacific: Baja California, Arizona and New Mexico, and states, provinces and territorial districts to their north and west, Australasia, and Asia excluding the Middle East.
(2) Central: Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama and states, provinces and territorial districts to their north; and Mexico (except for Baja California) and Central and South America.
(3) Atlantic: Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and sites not in any other region.
(4) Eastern: Florida, and states, provinces and territorial districts to its north and east.
The WorldCon shall be held in the first region above (Pacific) in 1993, and shall rotate sequentially through the regions in the order listed; PROVIDED THAT the WorldCon may be held any year at any site, if there has been no WorldCon within five thousand (5000) kilometers of that site in the preceding ten (10) years; and PROVIDED THAT the following bids active when this amendment was enacted shall be permitted to bid in their declared years, as if they were in the appropriate regions for those years: Perth in 1994.
Maker of motion: Erwin Strauss,
Seconder: Lloyd Penney
[Note that there are both maps and a very detailed specification of these proposed zones attached to this motion, neither of which scanned very well. – Pat McMurray 29 December 1999]