The World Science Fiction Society

Minutes of the Business Meeting 1982
Preliminary Business Meeting 2, Saturday

Return to Main 1982 Index

The World Science Fiction Society Business Meeting at Chicon IV was scheduled to be held in four sessions, daily from Friday, Sept. 3, to Monday, Sept, 6, 1982 (10 A.M.-noon on Friday, Saturday, and Monday; 9 A.M.-noon on Sunday) in the Columbus Ballroom E and F of the Hyatt Regency Chicago. Only the first three of these sessions proved to be necessary, and Sunday's was postponed from 9 to 10 A.M. The officers for all three sessions were: Donald Eastlake, Presiding Officer; George Flynn, Secretary; Richard Katze, Esq, Counsel; Leslie Turek, Timekeeper; and Paula Lieberman, Sergeant-at-Arms.

The texts of those motions that were printed in full in the Chicon IV Program Book will be cited here only by reference.

Saturday, Sept. 4. 1982

The meeting was called to order at 10:04 A.M.

The Chair gave a preliminary report on the question of the word "licensed" in Article 1, Section 6, of the current Constitution (see debate on Item 7, p 4). The sentence in question was given first passage at IguanaCon and ratified at Seacon ‘79. Bob Hillis, who was Presiding Officer at IguanaCon, felt that the text had contained "licensed". The Chair noted that it would take a 2/3 vote to correct the record since it had been published for several years in the current form. MS (Joseph Lattin), to correct the record by inserting the word "licensed". The Chair cautioned that debate should be only on the question of what actually happened (rather than what the text ought to be). In the debate, various others contended that the word "licensed" had specifically been rejected at the time. MS (Richard Russell) to direct the Presiding Officer to consult the records and make the change if they so indicate, as a substitute for Mr. Lattin’s motion. MS (Rick Katze) to call all questions: no objection. Mr. Russell’s amendment passed 31-9. The motion as amended then passed 20-7 (2/3 vote required). [See Appendix C for the result of the investigation.]

All other business having been disposed of, the Fanzine-Hugo motions were next on the agenda, in accordance with the motion passed Friday. Robert Sacks inquired about an additional motion (Item 24) that had been submitted to the Chair; the Chair declined to admit it, since it had not been signed by its makers. However, the Chair ruled in response to an inquiry that (with respect to other motions) an actual signature was not required, as long as the makers were identified. [For the information of readers, the text of the rejected motion was "MOVED, to amend the WSFS Constitution by inserting a new section in Article 1: "Professional Science Fiction authors are the backbone of science fiction conventions, and should be given special consideration at the World Science Fiction Convention." " The makers were in fact identified orally as Alan Huff and Robert Gerber.]

FANZINE-HUGO MOTIONS:

(The chart in Appendix B should be consulted to make this intelligible.) The Chair proposed that the motions be considered (if all of them are still there) from the bottom right of the chart upwards. That is, first consider Items 16, 9, and 19, with a short debate on each, a longer debate between these three motions, and then selection of a single two-category proposal; then a short debate on Item 14, followed by a vote between Item 14 and the present rule; then a vote between the surviving one-category and two-category proposals; finally a choice between Items 10 and 21, followed by a choice between the survivor and the alternative one- or two-category proposal. There was no objection to this procedure. It was still necessary to give preliminary consideration to the individual motions, and to set debate limits. They were taken up in the same order as that established for the final consideration.

The Chair noted that the time was 11:56 A.M.; the time for adjournment was postponed 15 minutes without objection.

We were thus left with Items 16, 9, 19 and 21; it remained to set the time limits for the Fanzine Hugo debate. MS (Jill Eastlake) to set an overall limit of 30 minutes. The Chair suggested 4 minutes apiece on the individual motions, ard 8 minutes apiece on the remaining 3 higher nodes of the chart (Appendix B), for a total of 40 minutes: this proposal was passed overwhelmingly.

MS to adjourn: passed at 12:14 P.M. (69 people had signed the attendance list)


Return to Main 1982 Index
Pat McMurray pat@cooky.demon.co.uk
Last Update: January 2000